The door for negotiations is still open. We don't fear the Security Council. It's not the end of the world.

The doors for negotiation are open and we can still find a formula to reach a conclusion.

The Europeans interpreted and violated the Paris Agreement unilaterally.

Circumstances have changed. We have to wait and see how developments unfold within the five veto-holding countries.

It (the IAEA meeting) is unnecessary under the current circumstances, and it has been staged politically under pressures of certain countries.

The NPT is an international commitment and we are committed to that.

Operating some centrifuges is different from the enrichment, and we will continue the research work and never give in under pressures.

The second message is that we cannot accept that international rules are not accepted.

The Russian proposal is ambiguous. If they want to propose enrichment (only) in Russia we have said it is not acceptable. But if it is a complementary or parallel plan, we will study that.

The Russian proposal is not on our agenda anymore. Circumstances have changed. We have to wait and see how things go with the five veto-holding countries (on the council).